<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: the misuse of the Re:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anitaashland.com/132/re-the-misuse-of-the-re/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anitaashland.com/132/re-the-misuse-of-the-re/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Healy</title>
		<link>http://anitaashland.com/132/re-the-misuse-of-the-re/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneymakingemail.com/Blog/?p=132#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Call me ignorant, but I used to think Re: meant &quot;regarding,&quot; just like in a real physical letter.

That said, I agree. The use of Re: in commercial email is getting overdone. I&#039;ve used it in the past, but have made a rule not to use it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me ignorant, but I used to think Re: meant &#8220;regarding,&#8221; just like in a real physical letter.</p>
<p>That said, I agree. The use of Re: in commercial email is getting overdone. I&#8217;ve used it in the past, but have made a rule not to use it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

